Subscribe
Demo

So, Tyson Fury vs Anthony Joshua is much too late. Speak to any sports fan in the street, and that’s the prevalent point they’ll make. But it’s not just that the British super-fight is years too late; with a version of contracts initially signed this spring, the fight is months too late within this year alone; and despite Eddie Hearn playing down the idea of 3am ring walks in Cardiff, he wasn’t exactly emphatic – prepare for the fight to be hours too late, to serve an American audience.

When the two behemoths clash on 11 December, whether in the dead of night or in its doorway, they will meet in the twilight of their careers. This is no longer a fight to crown the greatest heavyweight of a generation.

Advertisement

That shipped sailed in 2022, when Joshua’s eligibility was audited by Oleksandr Usyk for a second time. And if you thought you could still catch a glimpse of the sails on the horizon, as if the turbulent seas of the heavyweight division might usher this particular ship back into shore, it drifted out of view for good in 2024, when Usyk added two wins over Fury to his resume.

Tyson Fury (left) and Anthony Joshua will do battle after years of waiting (Getty)

What about a fight to crown the best British heavyweight in the sport right now?

That prospect was ground into powder when Daniel Dubois floored Joshua four times in five rounds under the Wembley arch, two years ago, with a performance that suggested he would likely do the same to Fury. Even this May, when Dubois was dropped twice by Fabio Wardley before battling back to win down the stretch, you had to wonder whether Fury and “AJ” would withstand Wardley’s weapons nowadays.

Advertisement

Perhaps the bigger issue with Joshua vs Fury, at this stage in their careers, is that it might not even tell us who is the better of the two. It might simply tell us who is worse right now.

You could argue there are plenty of results in the heavyweight division that do not categorically prove superiority; “it only takes one punch”, goes the cliche, but that does mean a fighter sometimes requires a couple of wins over another to convince fans (an AJ vs Fury rematch may come in 2027, in fairness). Or, a particular type of performance may be needed. But even then, if you take Dubois’s one-sided showing against Joshua as an example, had they met three years earlier, perhaps the fight would have gone drastically differently.

At least Joshua (30-4, 27 KOs) and Fury (36-2-1, 25 KOs) have aged together, with the “Gypsy King” a little over one year older than his compatriot. Yet the most crucial element around this fight has always been this: you want to feel that either man could genuinely win.

It is easy to say the fight should have happened five years ago, when Joshua was unified champion and Fury held the WBC belt. Indeed, the bout was signed that summer, but Deontay Wilder threatened legal action against Fury, who was then tied up by a trilogy fight with the American while AJ boxed Usyk for the first time.

Fury was dropped twice in his third clash with Deontay Wilder – but won in the end (Getty)

Fury was dropped twice in his third clash with Deontay Wilder – but won in the end (Getty)

Organise Joshua vs Fury in the aftermath of those results, and Fury would have been a considerable favourite, having beaten Wilder for a second time while Joshua suffered his second loss in four fights.

Advertisement

Fast forward three years and, yes, the fight would have felt very late already, but one could argue it would have felt more balanced; Fury had just sustained his first loss, a narrow decision versus Usyk, while Joshua was on a streak of three emphatic knockouts.

So, from a timing perspective, Joshua vs Fury fight taking place in the embers of 2027 is a disappointment, a disgrace – however you want to word it – but if the former world champions were meeting at a point of mutual vulnerability, that would be a consolation.

That doesn’t necessarily seem to be the case, though.

Read the full article here

Leave A Reply

2026 © Prices.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.