I Do Not Want Myles Turner On The Utah Jazz

Last week, the Utah Jazz fandom found a new, shiny object of desire. It wouldn’t be the summertime without this tradition; I’ll remember fondly the days when I would contemplate longingly the backcourt fit of Donovan Mitchell and Jrue Holiday, or how Jerami Grant’s length could potentially shore up our perimeter defense. However, the new member of this storied club is not sparking my imagination in quite the same way.

Enter Myles Turner.

Advertisement

Now, do not be fooled by the headline, because I do understand from where this fascination originates. The offseason is long, the tanking was arduous, the highlights are tantalizing – I get it.

Myles Turner is a center and our center is Jusuf Nurkic.

Myles Turner is a center who shoots three pointers and the two 2026 NBA finalists both had centers who shoot three pointers.

Myles Turner was the starting center on a team that very nearly won the championship.

I understand all of these points, but still – I do not want Myles Turner on my team. Some of my reasons are logical, some of them less so. And who knows? Maybe all of them will prove hilarious in hindsight when Turner is wearing Jazz purple and hoisting the Larry O’Brien.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, I will attempt to explain, in 4 points, why I do not think that Myles Turner is the answer to Utah’s troubles, before quickly outlining the course of action I would prefer the franchise take as they trek into their next era of relevance.

1. Myles Turner does not fit what we need on offense

While it is true that I can’t name more than a handful of centers who can hit three pointers more effectively than Myles Turner, I do not think this offensive quirk is enough to constitute a proper fit in the Utah Jazz offense. Much of my concerns with Turner stem from his physical weakness. This flaw isn’t obvious while looking at his physical profile – he’s 6’11, 250 LBs, and appears reasonably well-built – but makes itself very evident with any extended time watching his game. Combining the last two seasons, Turner is taking less than 20% of his shots near the rim, and this past season, in the minutes Giannis was on the bench and Turner was on the court, the Bucks attempted 4 less shots at the rim every 100 possessions. Additionally, Giannis-only lineups attempted more shots at the rim that Giannis+Turner lineups, and this trend extends for several years into the past. That number may not jump off the screen, but it is a huge swing for a single player to generate. Turner does not play with force (especially damaging as a center in a league once again becoming more physical), and that leads to his units not taking advantage of the most physical areas on the court. Additionally, this playstyle is harder to accommodate against elite defenses – versus the Thunder in the finals, Turner posted the 3rd worst shooting percentage in a finals series by a center post-merger, at 36.8% (credit @carsobi on Twitter for the stat). One series sample sizes aren’t worth too much, but it is indicative of the type of offensive profile Turner has demonstrated his whole career.

Advertisement

This is already a problem that I anticipate the Jazz to have. Jaren Jackson Jr. loves his floaters and short mid range jump-shots, and has a similar impact on his teams rim frequency (albeit less severe). Keyonte George has slimmed down across his NBA career and prefers operating from the perimeter without putting too much pressure on the rim. At least early on, Darryn Peterson will be too slight to strain defenses with his slashing. In a league where force is becoming a prerequisite amongst the contenders of the highest echelon, the Jazz are already lacking, and Turner would do nothing to but add another player who is not always looking to put consistent pressure on the defense.

However, it’s not like Nurkic is leading a steam engine to the rim with his basket pressure, so what gives? Turner’s poor offensive fit is compounded by two facts: he is a horribly poor offensive rebounder, and he doesn’t bring any semblance of passing to a lineup. His rebounding woes are well documented – except for old man Brook Lopez, Turner posted the worst total rebounding percentage among centers who started any meaningful number of games, and that is buoyed significantly by a respectable enough defensive rebounding percentage. The possession battle is key to good offenses, and Turner is a detriment in that regard while Nurkic is a bit more positive. Second-chance opportunities off of offensive rebounds are some of the most efficient possessions in basketball, so while pulling them down isn’t necessarily sexy, it is a guaranteed way to significantly bolster your overall offensive footprint. The Jazz already are lacking in this department (hopefully, Markkanen can once again be quietly pretty good at this at the small forward position), and likely cannot afford another significant negative at their center position.

Finally, the playmaking. I sometimes feel like the only one worried that the Jazz are constructing a roster that is being marketed by fans as one with top-5-in-the-league potential, and yet has very few good passers. Keyonte is a plus, Collier is a plus, and Nurkic is a plus. The rest of the roster ranges from inconsequential to actively damaging distributors. This next year, Ace and Darryn and Lauri and Jackson and Svi and Hayes and Green and Okogie and Hinson will all clearly be at their best being set up by a playmaker. These guys are play finishers, who are valuable to have, but are an archetype that starts to bring in diminishing marginal returns ESPECIALLY if your team doesn’t feature an all-world level playmaker. I anticipate Nurkic, once again, being a key hub in coach Hardy’s system – he sets up shop on top of the key while the stars run in circles around the perimeter or cut to the basket. This system will do some to limit the heavy pressure that will already be put on Keyonte’s shoulders, as well as allow Darryn Peterson to climatize to the offense in a more natural manner. I hesitate when I see proposals for lineups where Keyonte is the only passer who is better than the league-wide positional average, and I struggle even more when the players around him also can’t create for themselves off the dribble. A team of Keyonte-Darryn-Lauri-Jackson-Turner is, on the surface, tantalizing (and would likely play many minutes together) – there are 5 strong shooters, and most are solid athletes. But when you really dive into how they would function together offensively, questions start to arise. Keyonte is the only above average passer. Keyonte is the only above average ballhandler (Jackson is close, but it isn’t an uber-impressive skill either way). No one listed has shown the ability to consistently reach the basket and collapse the defense off of the dribble. That is 4 play-finishers and 1 playmaker who has playmaked positively for 1 season on a destitute roster. When the Jazz inevitably run into the Spurs or the Thunder (both of which are unavoidable if contention is the goal), the team will get torn to shreds without more positive decision makers on the floor next to George, and for that reason, I anticipate Nurkic’s DHO offense being a sneakily-important option come playoff time. So yes, Turner’s shooting is immediately appealing, but his flaws on offense overlap too harshly with flaws already present on the roster for me to be too excited about his fit in Utah.

TLDR: Myles Turner is inefficient, doesn’t take enough shots near the rim, is a poor passer and offensive rebounder, and amplifies the flaws already present on the roster. The shooting is cool, but doesn’t make up for his deficiencies.

Advertisement

2. Myles Turner does not fit what we need on defense

This section will be shorter, because the problem is less damning. I have never been overly impressed with Myles Turner as a defender (he always seemed to me more of a shot-blocker than a paint-defender), but that does not mean he is bad. For most years of his career, his teams have been better defensively with Turner on the court. This was not true in either of the Pacer’s deep playoff runs in 2024 and 2025, but I digress – Turner would not actively hurt the Jazz on defense.

However, due to his overlap with Jaren Jackson Jr., I think the fit of Turner on the Jazz defense is not worth the opportunity cost. Be it Steven Adams, or Zach Edey, or Jonas Valanciunas, the Grizzlies had the right idea – pair JJJ with a bruising interior presence to unlock the best version of him. I do not think Turner is that presence. I, once again, think back to his physical weakness. He is often unwilling to bash and brawl in the paint with the biggest and the baddest, and that is reflected in his poor rebounding numbers. Per my eyes, and despite his position, he functions less like a true defensive anchor and more like a shot-blocking roamer. That isn’t, in a vacuum, a bad thing – Kevin Garnett and Andrei Kirilenko are two of my favorite defensive players ever, and they functioned similarly. Additionally, Myles Turner has been a positive defensive player in his career – I am not trying to deny that. However, I do not think the type of defensive player that Myles Turner is will support or magnify the type of defensive player that Jaren Jackson Jr. is. Combined this with the fact that I think other options more additive to JJJ will become available at some point on the trade market (I’m looking at you Jarrett Allen), I think that trading for Turner would be too hasty a solution to Utah’s defensive issues.

Advertisement

TLDR: Myles Turner is a good defensive player, but we should hold out for a good defensive player who is a better defensive fit.

3. I do not want to pay Myles Turner in 2029

This point is short and simple. Myles Turner is 30 years old, and his birthday is in March. During any potential playoff run the Jazz will be on in 2029, Myles Turner will be 33 years old, and will be owed 29 million dollars. Historically, defensive big men display some of the worst longevity of any archetype in the league. If Turner plays anywhere near the level he did last season, his current contract appears to be an overpay, and considering his age, the contract could very well get worse before it becomes better. Above all else, I do not want to be attaching draft assets to move off of Myles Turner so we can pay our young guys when extension season comes up. This, combined with the fact that he isn’t clearly additive to our current group of players, really make the trade idea risky in my mind.

Advertisement

TLDR: Just read it.

4. I do not like watching Myles Turner play basketball

I told you not all of these would be logical.

At the end of the day, I trust my eye, and my eye is consistently frustrated whenever Myles Turner is on the basketball court. He’s tall, and fast, and can shoot, and can jump, and yet he always leaves me wanting something more. He’s too jumpy on defense when his wingspan doesn’t require him to be. He’s too soft on offense when his athleticism could help him be a force. His hands are big but he can’t catch. He doesn’t move the ball, except in the direction of the hoop when he is contested and behind the three point line. He whines, and whines, and whines. He’s never giving me enough.

Advertisement

This tweet describes my feelings well;

Part of this is an aesthetic bias – I like my big men to be big men – and maybe part of this could be waved away if I watched more Pacers and Bucks games this past decade. However, my eyes have told me the same story for the majority of Myles Turner’s career; he’s missing something. Maybe it’s strength or toughness or decision making or something else entirely, but whatever it is, it has put a cap on just how positive he can be on the basketball court.

This isn’t to say that Myles Turner is a negative player, because I don’t think that’s true. His defense is a plus and his shooting can unlock certain offenses. I do not hate Myles Turner. However, it is to say that the type of player that Myles Turner is is not a player that I want to watch for 82 games and a playoff run. He’d block some big shots and hit some big threes and maybe even get a singular offensive rebound, but his flaws prevent me from ever being excited to add him to the roster. He can continue to do his thing for the rest of his career… but just not for my team.

Advertisement

TLDR: Watching Myles Turner makes me mad and I like to be happy.

So…what SHOULD the Jazz do?

For this season? Likely stand pat. With the additional cap flexibility that comes from trading Walker Kessler, the team has been afforded the luxury of patience. This season can be one for development while Nurkic fills in as a flawed but only short term option at center. We can attempt Jaren Jackson Jr. at center and verify if power forward really is his ideal position. Additionally, who knows which centers are available next trade deadline? Or the offseason after that? Perhaps the Thunder think it’s time to move on from Isaiah Hartenstein, or the Cavaliers cut ties with Jarrett Allen? It could be Wendell Carter or Neemias Queta or (don’t laugh at me) Nikola Jokic. We do not need to hurry into a player who doesn’t fit and a contract with downward potential.

Advertisement

We do not need to expect the Jazz to be contenders this year. It’s a fun exercise, but perhaps one not quite deserved. We’ve rooted for a losing team for so long, that the moment any marginal improvements are made, we naturally over-index. I do not believe that trading for Myles Turner would make us any more likely to contend for a title, but it is nonetheless a move that a team with aspirations for a deep playoff run would make. So let’s see what we have, at least at first; no need to trade our birthright for a mess of pottage.

What do you think on Myles Turner? Would you be in favor of a trade to add him to the team? Sound off below.