The Blame Game: What the Eagles Reveal About NFL Media Leaks

While both can be true: Jalen Hurts was voted for overwhelmingly by his teammates as team captain, and in a 2025 survey by The Athletic, was named the 12th most admired leader in US sports (first among NFL players).

Advertisement

Clearly the picture painted by his teammates and ‘anonymous sources’ vary greatly.

The Historical Precedent

One point to highlight is that this is not a Nick Sirianni anomaly.

It could be said this a historical precedent of the Philadelphia Eagles. It is the ‘Carson Wentz is the problem’ track running on a loop.

• 2020-2021 – Doug Pederson was on the verge of being fired, Carson Wentz was suddenly leaked as “going rogue” and killing plays out of spite.

• 2014 – When Chip Kelly needed to justify cutting star receiver DeSean Jackson, sudden reports of “gang connections” hit the press an hour before his release.

• 2005 – While many blamed Andy Reid‘s clock management for the Eagles loss in the Super Bowl, the narrative shifted to Donovan McNabb vomiting in the huddle.

The names change. The coaching staffs cycle out. But the PR crisis strategy remains eerily similar.

From a brand management perspective, this repetition is exactly what harms a franchise long-term. “Patterns carry more weight than any single incident,” Sterling Randle explains:

“One situation can be explained, but when it shows up across different eras and different players, it starts to define how the organization is viewed. Winning and big contracts can mask that, but they don’t erase it. Where it tends to show up is in the margins. When decisions are close, this becomes part of the calculus.”

Advertisement

– Sterling Randle

However, assuming the Philadelphia front office invented this playbook is a mistake. Jason La Canfora was keen to point out:

“If you think this is an Eagles thing, you are missing the point. This is tried and true around the league. Philly gets magnified because it’s a different sort of media market and they have won in different ways despite dysfunction. Players get buried on the way out almost everywhere, almost all the time.”

– Jason La Canfora

A quick glance across the NFL landscape over the past five years proves his point:

Dallas Cowboys: Mike McCarthy and Dak Prescott (January 2024)

• The Coaching Scrutiny: Following an embarrassing 48-32 playoff loss to the Green Bay Packers where the Cowboys fell behind 27-0, Head Coach Mike McCarthy’s job security was heavily questioned.

• The Narrative Pivot: Almost immediately after the loss, a “quiet bombshell” report was published by NFL Network’s Jane Slater, citing an anonymous player. The leak simultaneously praised the coaching staff by claiming, “Mike puts it all out there for everyone to be successful,” while shifting the blame for the offensive failure directly onto the quarterback, citing “concern that Dak panics when the first read is not there”.

Advertisement

Chicago Bears: Matt Eberflus and Justin Fields (Fall 2023)

• The Coaching Scrutiny: The Chicago Bears experienced a highly dysfunctional 2023 season under Head Coach Matt Eberflus, leading to widespread speculation about his job security.

• The Narrative Pivot: During a primetime broadcast, the media narrative heavily focused on how much starting quarterback Justin Fields could learn from undrafted backup Tyson Bagent. Local media and reporters later criticized this coverage, revealing it was fueled by a “back-stabbing whisper campaign” and an intentional “team planted narrative” behind the scenes to scapegoat Fields and protect the coaching staff.

New York Giants: Brian Daboll and Daniel Jones (November 2024)

• The Coaching Scrutiny: Following a 2-8 start to the 2024 season and a history of offensive struggles, Head Coach Brian Daboll and General Manager Joe Schoen were placed squarely on the “hot seat”.

• The Narrative Pivot: To spark the offense and avoid paying contract injury guarantees, the organization abruptly benched and subsequently released quarterback Daniel Jones. The attempt to push all organizational failure onto the quarterback was so blatant that an anonymous NY Giants player explicitly called out the team’s brass to the media, stating that the “scapegoating” of Jones for the team’s poor record was “weak as f—“.

Survey: NFL fans and the Media

We collected responses from NFL fans to better understand the effect these stories have on a fanbase and their perception of their team.

From our survey of over 5,000 fans between 18 and 65+ covering all 32 NFL franchises, a number of key themes became apparent:

• The “Jalen Hurts” Phenomenon: The most drastic difference between Eagles fans and the rest of the league revolves around Jalen Hurts. 40.68% of Eagles fans feel that negative reports about him consistently appear during periods of coaching or team-wide criticism, which is almost double the rate of the rest of the league (21.13%).

• The Fans Know: Only 6% of Eagles fans said “No” to feeling that negative reports about Jalen Hurts appear during periods of coaching or team-wide criticism, meaning nearly 94% of the Eagles fanbase perceives a correlation between team criticism and negative reports surfacing about their quarterback.

• Media Scrutiny: Respondents largely view these negative reports as a media-driven cycle. Nearly half the respondents (48.58%) cited “Media speculation” as the top reason these anonymous reports come out, and 44.55% believe the media is the sole benefactor of these storylines.

• Don’t Trust Everything You Read: Eagles fans hold a stronger conviction against the media than other fanbases – 50.28% believe the media benefits the most from negative reports about a QB, compared to 44.12% of the rest of the league.

• Blame Shifting: Almost a quarter of respondents, 24.19%, feel these leaks are a “Strategic attempt to shift blame,” and about 15% believe the coaching staff actually benefits the most when negative QB reports surface.

• Unanimous Agreement on Timing: Across all NFL fanbases, there is massive agreement that QBs are lightning rods for blame. Over 67% believe QBs are blamed too much compared to coaches, and a staggering 92.18% have noticed negative reports about QBs conveniently appearing right after poor team performances.

If the goal of an anonymous leak is subtle narrative control, the strategy is failing spectacularly in Philadelphia. As PR expert, Sterling Randle points out, “If 94% of fans recognize that pattern, it is resoundingly not a successful public relations tool.’ The modern NFL consumer is simply too hyper-aware of the media machine to fall for the misdirection.”

Now it comes down to the bottom line…

The ultimate question is why would the Philadelphia Eagles chose April 2026 to escalate this to a fever pitch?

Advertisement

The answer can be found on the salary cap balance sheet. Below is Jalen Hurts’ current contract:

To break down the numbers and technical terms:

If the Eagles want to keep Hurts

They will need to negotiate an extension. Should Jalen Hurts play through the 2028 season on his current deal: the entire prorated salary in his voided years, over $97 million, will go straight on to their 2029 salary cap.

Conventional wisdom says the best time for the Eagles to renegotiate with Jalen Hurts is after the 2026 season, or early in 2027. Doing so will enable them to massage the salary cap, as Howie Roseman is known to do, to eliminate the potential of a massive $98.5million in dead cap hitting the Philadelphia salary cap in 2029.

Advertisement

If the Eagles want to cut Hurts

Jalen Hurts’ dead cap number drops in 2027 from $139.2m to $67.0m, while his scheduled salary cap hit increases from $31.9m to $42.1m. If they wanted to move on at the start of the 2027 offseason, they would have to swallow a $67m dead cap charge. Because that dead cap is higher than his scheduled cap hit, cutting him would actually penalize the Eagles, costing them an additional $24.8m in cap space.

If the Eagles wait a year

At the start of 2028, the Eagles have an easy out – they can save $23.2m in cap space by cutting Jalen Hurts.

Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer recently reported:

Advertisement

“The Eagles have no plans to extend Hurts this offseason, NFL sources said, even though teams with franchise quarterbacks often restructure contracts to create salary cap in return for more guaranteed years.”

– Jeff McLane

McLane also included this blistering quote from an anonymous team source regarding the quarterback’s status:

“He knows this is the last year of his guaranteed money… He knows the cat’s out on some of his baggage. You got to be able to produce. You can’t be near the bottom of the league in passing two years in a row with the amount of talent that we have. It’s not acceptable.”

Advertisement

– Jeff McLane

Whatever happens: Jalen Hurts won’t reach the end of 2028 on his current contract, or his current team. Everyone both inside and outside the organization should be hoping for their quarterback’s play to hit the same heights he has reached in his two Super Bowl appearances.

The Reputational Cost

Using the media to establish contractual leverage carries immense organizational risk. The NFL is a small fraternity, as Sterling Randle notes:

“Players and agents pay close attention to how situations like this are handled, especially when it involves a franchise quarterback. Once questions around leadership or locker room presence begin to surface, even indirectly, the conversation shifts beyond the player and toward the team itself. Those impressions influence how agents approach negotiations and how players evaluate opportunities.”

Advertisement

– Sterling Randle

There is also the risk of permanently alienating the market. Philadelphia fans have a long memory for organizational dysfunction, and Randle warns against the potential for long-lasting damage to the team’s reputation.

“We have seen how quickly sentiment can turn in a passionate market. The 1968 Santa Claus incident was a direct reflection of a fan base reacting to a team that had lost credibility on the field and off. That’s the risk these anonymous sources are flirting with. Once that relationship between team and fan base begins to erode, it is extremely difficult to rebuild.”

– Sterling Randle

The Reality

In betting terms, the Eagles appear to be shorting their own quarterback’s reputation to hedge against their coaching staff’s inadequacies. Fundamentally, the case is there to be made that the Philadelphia Eagles have replaced direct conflict resolution with media pressure.

Advertisement

But should sharp bettors actually fade the Eagles because of this manufactured crisis?

According to La Canfora, the smart money embraces the noise:

“Every situation is different, but the Eagles have often fared well when the sht starts flying. It’s kind of their brand. I’ll be bullish on them again. It all collapsed once, but they institutionally generally know how to handle it.”

– Jason La Canfora

Ultimately, public relations metrics do not win championships. When asked who actually benefits from this relentless cycle of blame and media spin, La Canfora offers a rhetorical question of his own.

Advertisement

“How many franchises have been more successful than the Eagles the last, say, five years?”

The playbook might be ugly, but the history books suggest it works.

Jason La Canfora and Sterling Randle spoke exclusively with Covers.com. All quotes in this article are taken from an exclusive interview conducted by Covers.com. Journalists and media outlets are welcome to use these quotes and the collected data, provided they are attributed to Covers.com. Please ensure links back to the original article to provide full context for readers.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.