Subscribe
Demo

Colts signed Nick Westbrook-Ikhine to add to their WR corps on a 1-year $1.2M deal.

The Colts decision to part ways with Pittman was much more of a financial decision than a football decision, but I am curious on what the Colts’ plan for the Z-receiver is. Michael Pittman was known for his toughness and reliability. He had a high catch % and could use his size, strength, and large frame in order to make contested catches. He was a solid compliment to Pierce, because Pierce could “lift the coverage” of the defense and create room for Michael Pittman to keep the Colts ahead of the sticks.

Advertisement

It would be silly of me not to acknowledge Pittman’s intangibles that I can’t see on film. He was obviously loved in the locker room, fought through numerous injuries to play on Sundays, and was the ultimate teammate. That is not something that is easy to replace.

However, Pittman’s skillset and production, in my opinion is something that is much easier to find. Unfortunately, after numerous injuries, it felt apparent that Pittman was a descending player that was no longer worth the price tag. Was he unplayable? Absolutely not. But he was closer to a league average starter than someone who was set to make big money on the last year of his deal. He lacked explosiveness, the ability to separate, and offered little no yards after the catch.

What the Colts do need to replace, besides Pittman’s elite competitive toughness, is his red zone production. Early in his career, the knock on Pittman was that he couldn’t find the end zone. He definitely worked to improve in that area and was productive for the Colts later in his tenure (particularly last year with Daniel Jones).

So now that the Colts have an opening at Z-reciever, can Nick Westbrook-Ikhine replace Pittman? I’m not sure.

Advertisement

On one hand, Westbrook-Ikhine has shown he can replace Pittman’s type of production. Scoring 9 times in 2024 with shaky QB play in Tennessee, he proved his calling card is finding the end zone.

On the other hand, he is shorter and smaller than Pittman at 6’2 211LBs. He does offer slightly more explosiveness off the line, but his catch % is significantly less than Pittmans.

If you follow the money, you would find it hard to believe NWI is the direct replacement for Pittman. It also wouldn’t make much sense for the Colts to part ways with a franchise stalwart, just to sign a less productive player of the same age to replace him.

In my opinion, all signs point toward the Colts drafting a WR this year and competing with NWI. I also don’t think it’s impossible the Colts are done adding at the position in free-agency.

But is there upside with NWI? Absolutely. Let’s look at what he brings to the table.

RED ZONE EFFICIENCY

Advertisement

One thing I like about NWI is that he can give the QB a throwing window in tight spaces

Read the full article here

Leave A Reply

2026 © Prices.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.